Re: El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 08:53:07AM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 06:40:09PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>
> >> > Do we still have licensing issues if we ship Postgres and OpenSSL
> >> > together?
> >>
> >> See
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150801151410.GA28344%40awork2.anarazel.de
> >
> > True, but the current license is unchanged and has the advertising
> > clause, which I think we have to honor if we ship OpenSSL:
> >
> > https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html
> >
> > I assume Windows has to ship OpenSSL with the installer and has to abide
> > by this, for example. OSX might have to do the same. It might be good
> > to see what we do for Windows packages.
>
> We already do it for all our installers - Windows, OSX and Linux. We
> have to, otherwise we wouldn't be able to ensure the same binaries
> would run on all the different supported versions.

OK, good. So the Mac installers would have to do the same thing if they
also start shipping OpenSSL too.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +