Re: TABLESAMPLE docs found in search, but are 404

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
<stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
> On 08/07/2015 11:11 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>> On 08/07/2015 10:12 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
>>> <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
>>>> On 08/06/2015 09:01 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>>> Folks:
>>>>>
>>>>> If you search:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/search/?u=%2Fdocs%2F9.5%2F&q=tablesample
>>>>>
>>>>> You turn up a number of doc pages detailing the new TABLESAMPLE
>>>>> functionality. However, if you actually click on the links:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/tablesample-method-functions.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/catalog-pg-tablesample-method.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ... they are 404. Doc build errors?
>>>>
>>>> no this looks like an artifact of the alpha2 release - it seems like the
>>>> docs loaded to the website for 9.5 are currently out-of-sync with the
>>>> webspider feeding our search engine(in this particular case the reason
>>>> is the TABLESAMPLE rewrite from tom). I assume dave has that on his
>>>> radar...
>>>
>>> As far as I'm aware, it's fully automated, but I'm not at all familiar
>>> with the code and am probably not going to be able to investigate
>>> until next week due to other commitments. Not sure when Magnus is
>>> back, but he can probably help with some pointers at least.
>>
>> well I think the point is the timing of the docs loading process during
>> the release vs the timing of the job that does the spidering.
>> Since I was not aware how far you had progressed with the release
>> (especially when you had done the docs loading) it made not a lot of
>> sense investigating further on the search/spider side.
>
> After the recent reindexing runs, search is now providing the correct urls.
> While this is a very minor issue usually (because it is usually
> extremely rare that we make changes to the docs that shift urls around
> especially in tagged/stable branches) maybe we should consider adding a
> forced search reindex after a docs push to our release notes?

Not a bad idea. Do we have a simple way of forcing it at the moment?

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company