Re: Planet posting policy

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
Date: 2011-07-14 19:14:07
Message-ID: CA+OCxowAZkw1sGyfRUsEKrPi=rksB=StkC4wOe-z976xbJ+jzw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Thursday, July 14, 2011, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 12:48 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>
> Another example would be this blog post, which planet wouldn't aggregate:
>
> http://www.commandprompt.com/blogs/alex_shulgin/2011/03/when_too_smart_becomes_stupid_fixing_a_ror_pgsql_driver_issue/
>
> The argument we got was that it was rails related, not postgresql releated. Seriously?

From who? I can't see why we wouldn't accept that.

> And, Marketing people are not in the community. I don't see any marketing people contributing to PostgreSQL.

No, but they'd love to get me to blog about my work on proprietary EDB stuff.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2011-07-15 02:29:10 Re: Planet posting policy
Previous Message Marc Fournier 2011-07-14 16:13:18 Re: postgresql.org down (not www.)