Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression
Date: 2020-03-17 13:32:11
Message-ID: CA+HiwqHoDEet+PEnM5Z0a91G48VDKHUBbJgG6MiBxgFGuRTAeQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi David,

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 8:53 PM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> On 2/25/20 3:42 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:16 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I added this patch to a commitfest
> >>
> >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/27/2467/
> >>
> >> It is very interesting speedup and it is in good direction to JIT expressions
> >
> > Thank you. I was planning to do that myself.
> >
> > I will take a look at your other comments in a day or two.
>
> Do you know when you'll have chance to look at Pavel's comments?

Sorry, I had forgotten about this. I will try to post an update by Thursday.

--
Thank you,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-03-17 14:09:18 Re: Missing errcode() in ereport
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2020-03-17 13:02:24 Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager