Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
Date: 2021-03-05 13:55:48
Message-ID: CA+HiwqHiWhFMW=frtqyP4u6GMXcqHtZKqb41vOX=FnUcQg82GQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:47 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 17:58 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > For example, with the attached PoC patch:
>
> I have incorporated your POC patch and added a regression test.
>
> I didn't test it thoroughly though.

Thanks. Although, I wonder if we should rather consider it a
standalone patch to fix a partition planning code deficiency.

--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2021-03-05 14:00:45 Re: [PATCH] Finally split StdRdOptions into HeapOptions and ToastOptions
Previous Message Álvaro Hernández 2021-03-05 13:49:36 Re: PROXY protocol support