Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
Date: 2021-03-05 13:47:34
Message-ID: 438f405ed3fd59dd38a75078f1bed162313c330e.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 17:58 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> For example, with the attached PoC patch:

I have incorporated your POC patch and added a regression test.

I didn't test it thoroughly though.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Allow-setting-parallel_workers-on-partitioned-tables.patch text/x-patch 18.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Hernández 2021-03-05 13:49:36 Re: PROXY protocol support
Previous Message David Steele 2021-03-05 13:45:17 Re: Nicer error when connecting to standby with hot_standby=off