| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Local partitioned indexes |
| Date: | 2018-02-10 14:32:21 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqHe_QTm8wwDUPjavmqDmqktZdPoOMj2v6fMQuVOARedFQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2018/01/19 23:55, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> > Local partitioned indexes
>
>> I noticed that the declarative partitioning section in ddl.sgml hasn't
>> been updated to reflect the features added by this commit. Attached patch
>> is an attempt to fix that.
>
> Thanks! I considered that keeping the old-style instructions creating
> per partition indexes individually was not necessary, so I removed them
> and pushed.
Ah, thanks. What you've committed looks perfect.
Regards,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-02-10 18:05:19 | pgsql: Fix oversight in CALL argument handling, and do some minor clean |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-02-10 13:09:47 | Re: pgsql: Local partitioned indexes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2018-02-10 15:45:40 | Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-02-10 13:09:47 | Re: pgsql: Local partitioned indexes |