From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Kato, Sho" <kato-sho(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Run-time pruning for ModifyTable |
Date: | 2019-07-08 02:33:56 |
Message-ID: | CA+HiwqHFG4US0Y1m=WQeExBfXAP-PxaWkRObNpxoLMQ3jUxd1A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kato-san,
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 1:40 PM Kato, Sho <kato-sho(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > If I understand the details of [1] correctly, ModifyTable will no longer
> > have N subplans for N result relations as there are today. So, it doesn't
> > make sense for ModifyTable to contain PartitionedRelPruneInfos and for
> > ExecInitModifyTable/ExecModifyTable
> > to have to perform initial and execution-time pruning, respectively.
>
> Does this mean that the generic plan will not have N subplans for N result relations?
> I thought [1] would make creating generic plans faster, but is this correct?
Yeah, making a generic plan for UPDATE of inheritance tables will
certainly become faster, because we will no longer plan the same query
N times for N child tables. There will still be N result relations
but only one sub-plan to fetch the rows from. Also, planning will
still cost O(N), but with a much smaller constant factor.
By the way, let's keep any further discussion on this particular topic
in the other thread.
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ryan Lambert | 2019-07-08 02:35:29 | Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-07-08 02:07:35 | Re: Another way to fix inherited UPDATE/DELETE |