Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-04-06 16:50:15
Message-ID: CA+HiwqGqFLByjximze4=SMHed8BPLnNv7zSFY-eZBwQ_OVz1+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Here's my proposed patch.
>
> Idle thought: how about renaming the "constfalse" argument and variables
> to "contradictory" or maybe just "contradict"?

Sounds fine to me.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-06 16:51:04 src/backend/partitioning
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-06 16:41:39 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning