Re: adding partitioned tables to publications

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Date: 2020-04-08 11:16:48
Message-ID: CA+HiwqGKsb1S1GgvdCsvOmOgva=W1fAb8eAYHhLePinUf+XwKQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 6:26 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> All committed.
>
> Thank you and everyone very much for working on this. I'm very happy
> that these two features from PG10 have finally met. :)

Thanks a lot for reviewing and committing.

prion seems to have failed:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prion&dt=2020-04-08%2009%3A53%3A13

Also, still unsure why the coverage report for pgoutput.c changes not good:
https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/replication/pgoutput/pgoutput.c.gcov.html

Will check.

--

Amit Langote
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-04-08 11:27:56 Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-04-08 11:12:13 Re: Parallel copy