From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: adding partitioned tables to publications |
Date: | 2020-04-08 12:21:19 |
Message-ID: | 21de0e53-0f5f-f31a-2dcb-6e4b35571c94@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-04-08 13:16, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 6:26 PM Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> All committed.
>>
>> Thank you and everyone very much for working on this. I'm very happy
>> that these two features from PG10 have finally met. :)
>
> Thanks a lot for reviewing and committing.
>
> prion seems to have failed:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prion&dt=2020-04-08%2009%3A53%3A13
This comes from -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE.
> Also, still unsure why the coverage report for pgoutput.c changes not good:
> https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/replication/pgoutput/pgoutput.c.gcov.html
I think this is because the END { } section in PostgresNode.pm shuts
down all running instances in immediate mode, which doesn't save
coverage properly.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tushar | 2020-04-08 12:22:12 | Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-04-08 12:12:13 | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |