Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side
Date: 2020-03-11 04:44:52
Message-ID: CA+HiwqFnS7kHGdJJdMU4e+WxO-+pPH-WsnjNEQR7nWhTWy1zwA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:39 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 6:19 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> > Attached is the updated version of the patch.
>
> Would it perhaps be better to return NULL instead of 0 in the
> statistics view if there is no data?

NULL sounds better than 0.

Thank you,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-03-11 04:51:47 Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2020-03-11 04:28:04 Re: [PATCH] Skip llvm bytecode generation if LLVM is missing