Re: On partitioning

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: On partitioning
Date: 2014-08-30 02:39:54
Message-ID: CA+HiwqFc70XP1PWQ3=iZPWByb=cTLNNdfLQ2Y_u5WDHcp0-NPQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Prompted by a comment in the UPDATE/LIMIT thread, I saw Marko Tiikkaja
> reference Tom's post
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1598.1399826841@sss.pgh.pa.us
> which mentions the possibility of a different partitioning
> implementation than what we have so far. As it turns out, I've been
> thinking about partitioning recently, so I thought I would share what
> I'm thinking so that others can poke holes. My intention is to try to
> implement this as soon as possible.
>

+1.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-08-30 03:27:27 Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?
Previous Message David G Johnston 2014-08-30 01:23:05 Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence?