Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence?

From: David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence?
Date: 2014-08-30 01:23:05
Message-ID: 1409361785561-5816996.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund-3 wrote
> On 2014-08-29 17:55:38 -0700, David G Johnston wrote:
>> Andres Freund-3 wrote
>
>>
>> pg_get_sequence_ownedby(...)
>
> My problem is that that possibly be confused with the user owning the
> sequence :/

Though as soon as that person reads the output their misunderstanding would
be obvious.

I think it's fine but "ownedbycol" or "owningcol" would be ok.

David J.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Inverse-of-pg-get-serial-sequence-tp5816933p5816996.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2014-08-30 02:39:54 Re: On partitioning
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-08-30 01:03:12 Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence?