| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Date: | 2018-04-07 06:41:35 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqF5NS4239=sp5y4hbtyebkSAe1JJibS5AKxO=DGmgtjLA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Given that the difference only appeared on animals that David pointed
>> out have big-endian architecture, it seems we'd only need two output
>> files.
>
> Dunno, I'm wondering whether 32 vs 64 bit will make a difference.
There was one 32-bit animal in the failing set, which apparently
produces the same hashes as others (allegedly due to endianness
difference).
powerpc 32-bit userspace on ppc64 host:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=termite&dt=2018-04-06%2023%3A40%3A07
...and it has turned green since the alternative outputs fix went in.
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=termite&dt=2018-04-07%2004%3A06%3A09
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-04-07 06:57:03 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2018-04-07 06:34:24 | Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data |