Re: Slony replication

From: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To: PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slony replication
Date: 2007-12-10 15:45:40
Message-ID: C6D37BBC-A0B4-49CA-90AB-376AD56F2253@khera.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-support pgsql-general


On Dec 8, 2007, at 9:21 AM, Geoffrey wrote:

> I am quite new to Slony as well, but one of the first requirements
> the docs state is:
>
> Thus, examples of cases where Slony-I probably won't work out well
> would include:
>
> * Sites where connectivity is really "flakey"
> * Replication to nodes that are unpredictably connected.
>
> So I suspect Slony is not a solution for your effort. See:

If your DB doesn't change very much (like a few hundred or thousand
update/insert/delete per day), then slony can work just fine in such a
batch mode. Things break down when you accumulate several hundred
thousand or more changes between times when you're connected.

In response to

Browse pgadmin-support by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2007-12-10 23:50:22 Re: Fedora Core 8.0 status?
Previous Message Raymond O'Donnell 2007-12-10 13:41:53 Re: Unable to add server in PGadmin

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tino Wildenhain 2007-12-10 15:46:21 Re: Simpler dump?
Previous Message Douglas McNaught 2007-12-10 15:44:39 Re: Simpler dump?