| From: | Chad Sellers <csellers(at)tresys(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com> |
| Cc: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
| Date: | 2009-02-02 16:17:40 |
| Message-ID: | C5AC86D4.A4A9E%csellers@tresys.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/30/09 5:43 PM, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Joshua, Kohei-san,
>
> So, for 8.4: *if* we included in 8.4 a version of SEPostgres with all
> features *except* row-level security, would it still be useful to the
> SELinux community?
>
Yes, it's definitely still useful. While many of the use cases we've wanted
this for require row-level access control, there have been several that did
not. It is definitely still useful, especially if it is a path toward
row-level access control in a later release.
Chad
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-02-02 16:34:30 | Re: new buildfarm client code feature release |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-02-02 16:11:11 | Re: reloptions with a "namespace" |