Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests
Date: 2023-04-07 15:55:08
Message-ID: C561BAC4-803C-4C44-A212-6E3C2D607E57@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 7 Apr 2023, at 16:58, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> Note it just fails on the 32build, not the 64bit build. Unfortunately I don't
> think debian's multiarch in bullseye support installing enough of perl in
> 32bit and 64bit.

I should probably avoid parsing logfiles with fever-induced brainfog, I
confused myself to think it was both =(

> Maybe I am a bit confused, but isn't that just an existing requirement? Why
> would we expect this patchset to change what dependencies use of
> interactive_psql() has?

Correct, there is no change from the current implementation.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-04-07 15:58:23 Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-04-07 15:52:37 Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests