Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple

From: Duncan Rance <postgres(at)dunquino(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple
Date: 2012-02-09 15:07:09
Message-ID: C5517898-F368-40A5-B12A-BB225C144A26@dunquino.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 9 Feb 2012, at 15:02, Tom Lane wrote:

> Duncan Rance <postgres(at)dunquino(dot)com> writes:
>> Our customers are keen to get the official release as soon as possible. They are on 9.0.6, so I guess this'll be 9.0.7? I'm new here so I don't know how long this might take, and I promised I'll find out for them. Any ideas?
>
> There's no firm plan at the moment. The earliest it could happen is
> around the end of the month, since various key people have other
> commitments in the next couple weeks. I'm not promising it *will*
> happen then, but that's the way things look right now.
>
> (Since you're new around here, I'll explain that the way this works
> is that the pgsql-core and pgsql-packagers lists agree on a release
> date in advance. We've had some preliminary discussions, and people
> seem to agree that this is a bad enough bug to force a release, but
> no date's been set. Once a schedule decision is made, some core
> member --- often me --- will announce it on pgsql-hackers, so you
> can keep an eye on that list if you want advance notice.)
>
> regards, tom lane

Good explanation. Thanks Tom!

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2012-02-09 17:03:47 Re: BUG #6450: PQexec stuck.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-02-09 15:02:07 Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-02-09 15:16:04 Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-02-09 15:02:07 Re: BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple