Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important

Tom,

On 3/17/06 7:03 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Speaking of which, I've been trying to think of a talk proposal and am
> not coming up with anything that seems terribly sexy. I've talked a
> couple times about the planner and am afraid people would be bored by
> that again. I'd be willing to hold forth on almost any part of the
> backend system design (a bold claim, but with three months to prepare
> I figure I can back it up...). What would people like to hear about?

How about future plans, so to speak? You've made some pretty significant
improvements for 8.1 (virtual tuples, the caching algorithm, etc), what's on
deck for 8.2 and beyond?

- Luke