| From: | Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important |
| Date: | 2006-03-18 07:28:10 |
| Message-ID: | 441BB68A.3020900@nttdata.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
Luke Lonergan wrote:
>>I figure I can back it up...). What would people like to hear about?
>
> How about future plans, so to speak? You've made some pretty significant
> improvements for 8.1 (virtual tuples, the caching algorithm, etc), what's on
> deck for 8.2 and beyond?
I'm *really* *really* interested in making PostgreSQL to be vacuum-less.
Can we have a vacuum-less PostgreSQL in the future? How?
If you have any ideas, I *really* want to hear about that from you.
It will be a next generation of PostgreSQL. :)
Thanks.
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-03-18 07:59:51 | Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-18 06:37:53 | Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-03-18 07:59:51 | Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-18 06:37:53 | Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update |