| From: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Blog post on EnterpriseDB...maybe off topic |
| Date: | 2006-02-18 15:41:07 |
| Message-ID: | C01C8013.1CB9E%llonergan@greenplum.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh,
On 2/18/06 7:38 AM, "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> wrote:
> I figure they'll have to do quite a lot to make progress in their chosen
> market, including:
>
> - SQL*Net protocol compatibility
> - Oracle Number datatype support
> - ROWID unique row identifier
> - Oracle Redo/Undo log format parsing and replay
> - SQL Loader format support
> - Oracle exp/imp format support
I forgot one:
- Make sort ordering equivalent to Oracle (trailing blanks don't count, for
instance)
- Luke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron | 2006-02-18 17:01:10 | Re: qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create |
| Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-02-18 15:38:59 | Re: Blog post on EnterpriseDB...maybe off topic |