| From: | Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2 |
| Date: | 2011-02-08 16:21:25 |
| Message-ID: | BLU0-SMTP918D219251CEE0845D9FCD8EEA0@phx.gbl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11-02-08 10:07 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
>
> * custom SPI exceptions - I'd really like this one to go in, because it
> allows writing UPSERT-kind functions in PL/Python very easily, and it's
> just a handful of lines of code
>
I will try to do a review of this one (probably tomorrow night) since
I've reviewed many of the related patches.
> * don't remove arguments - a bugfix, really, and a very small one
>
> So from the above, I'd say custom datatype parsers could get rejected if
> noone feels like having a discussion about it for 9.1. Table functions,
> custom SPI exceptions and tracebacks are niceties that if postponed to
> 9.2 will just mean that many features less in 9.1. The rest is bordering
> on bugfixes, and I think should go in.
>
> Cheers,
> Jan
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2011-02-08 16:21:27 | Re: WIP: RangeTypes |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-08 16:19:54 | Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 |