From: | "Jenny -" <nat_lazy(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | OffsetNumber offnum (LOCKTag) |
Date: | 2003-09-03 18:36:05 |
Message-ID: | BAY1-F138GNsokLQ8aZ0000134f@hotmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
the offnum of LOCKTAG I gather indicates which row (tuple) is being locked
in a row level locking. But when I lock 2 diffrent rows of a table, offset
for both is 0. and also offset is 0 if i take a table lock on the same
table. (blkno is the same for all three locks)..shouldnt the OffsetNumber
offnum be different for each individual row lociked? if not, then what field
of LOCKTAG recognizes each individual row (tuple) locked?
thanks!
_________________________________________________________________
Get MSN 8 and help protect your children with advanced parental controls.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | darren | 2003-09-03 18:44:30 | Re: is it possible to do this? have a subselect that |
Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2003-09-03 18:31:00 | Debian packages of 7.4beta2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-09-03 18:37:01 | Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-09-03 18:33:02 | Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken? |