Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Discussion - Search Objects

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Discussion - Search Objects
Date: 2011-06-01 07:59:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> One is allowed to drop the information_schema system catalog? I didn't
> know that. I guess it's all right 'cause you don't really need it.

I'm surprised you didn't know that :-). pgAdmin doesn't let you drop
it because it disables drop for all catalogs (I guess thats a minor
bug), but Postgres itself doesn't care because as you note, it's not
needed by the system and it's recognised that users may not want it
cluttering up their databases.

Dave Page
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK:
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Jasmin DizdarevicDate: 2011-06-01 08:05:14
Subject: Re: Discussion - Search Objects
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2011-06-01 07:53:46
Subject: Re: Discussion - Search Objects

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group