| From: | Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |
| Date: | 2011-06-01 08:05:14 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=-rV4nFWmBagCGK276vbtVSrqTXg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Can we use the pg_catalog?
2011/6/1 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> >
> > One is allowed to drop the information_schema system catalog? I didn't
> > know that. I guess it's all right 'cause you don't really need it.
>
> I'm surprised you didn't know that :-). pgAdmin doesn't let you drop
> it because it disables drop for all catalogs (I guess thats a minor
> bug), but Postgres itself doesn't care because as you note, it's not
> needed by the system and it's recognised that users may not want it
> cluttering up their databases.
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-06-01 08:09:26 | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-06-01 07:59:35 | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |