| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |
| Date: | 2011-06-01 07:59:35 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTimDfx9AqTPg_8n0bKMo6RpZL=H_FA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>
> One is allowed to drop the information_schema system catalog? I didn't
> know that. I guess it's all right 'cause you don't really need it.
I'm surprised you didn't know that :-). pgAdmin doesn't let you drop
it because it disables drop for all catalogs (I guess thats a minor
bug), but Postgres itself doesn't care because as you note, it's not
needed by the system and it's recognised that users may not want it
cluttering up their databases.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jasmin Dizdarevic | 2011-06-01 08:05:14 | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-06-01 07:53:46 | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |