| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix |
| Date: | 2011-05-26 12:22:50 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTikVmX89=FaJwFvncxiZmOdr-2UbLw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached revision doesn't use any threads or pipes on win32. It's far
> neater there. I'm still seeing that "lagger" process (which is an
> overstatement) at times, so I guess it is normal. On Windows, there is
> no detailed PS output, so I actually don't know what the lagger
> process is, and no easy way to determine that immediately occurs to
> me.
Process Explorer might help you there:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-05-26 12:24:44 | Re: Should partial dumps include extensions? |
| Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2011-05-26 12:12:41 | Database research papers |