Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta
Date: 2011-05-03 08:24:53
Message-ID: BANLkTi=Vh40p=NTzca7w3c9ngkw74o5EPw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> So far:
>
> http://www.cio.com.au/article/384968/open_source_postgresql_9_1_beta_released/
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/440666/ (subscriber-only content)
>
> http://www.databasejournal.com/features/postgresql/article.php/3932351/PostgreSQL-91-Gets-Synchronous.htm

I have to wonder why these mention PGXN given that at the moment it's
just a download site, providing similar functionality to software
catalog on www.postgresql.org.

When there is a command line client available, then sure, it should be
promoted, but until then it's a WIP (I would say vapourware, but I
that seems unfair, as I know David certainly is working on it). We
shouldn't be promoting features for which the primary feature isn't
yet written in our major version release announcements imnsho.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message damien clochard 2011-05-03 10:25:14 Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-05-03 01:40:53 Press coverage for 9.1 Beta