Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta
Date: 2011-05-03 13:26:58
Message-ID: 201105030626.58913.adrian.klaver@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 1:24:53 am Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> > So far:
> >
> > http://www.cio.com.au/article/384968/open_source_postgresql_9_1_beta_rele
> > ased/
> >
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/440666/ (subscriber-only content)
> >
> > http://www.databasejournal.com/features/postgresql/article.php/3932351/Po
> > stgreSQL-91-Gets-Synchronous.htm
>
> I have to wonder why these mention PGXN given that at the moment it's
> just a download site, providing similar functionality to software
> catalog on www.postgresql.org.
>
> When there is a command line client available, then sure, it should be
> promoted, but until then it's a WIP (I would say vapourware, but I
> that seems unfair, as I know David certainly is working on it).

Well the same could be said about SQL/MED and SE-postgres, both new items at the
just getting started stage:)

> We
> shouldn't be promoting features for which the primary feature isn't
> yet written in our major version release announcements imnsho.

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2011-05-03 13:49:30 Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2011-05-03 12:34:23 Re: Press coverage for 9.1 Beta