Re: Proposal: q-gram GIN and GiST indexes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: q-gram GIN and GiST indexes
Date: 2011-04-05 13:05:07
Message-ID: BANLkTi=AUAJxcDFGcScTijne2SkHb3p77A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> For example, here is distribution of q-grams count in 120 Mb of dblp paper
> titles (pretty large dataset).
> q   count
> 2    7218
> 3  115107
> 4  589428
> 5 1648453
> 6 3336685
> Number of 5-grams if about 15x larger than number of 3-grams. But most part
> of index space will be occupied by links to the rows(about 120 millions of
> links), while size of q-grams itself will be almost ignorable in comparison
> with it.

I am probably being stupid here, but doesn't the number of links to
rows grow proportionately to the number of n-grams?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luca Ferrari 2011-04-05 13:30:10 Re: 9.0.3 SIGFAULT on FreeBSD with dtrace
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2011-04-05 12:41:34 Re: Proposal: q-gram GIN and GiST indexes