Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions
Date: 2026-10-11 16:58:18
Message-ID: B9CD5543-9465-4081-ABD1-CA6C6CD9F862@justatheory.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 10, 2026, at 17:19, shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I may have missed some moves, so 122 is an upper bound. I can send the table if you want more detailed data.

Thanks for the offer but I can query the PGXN database directly. Will be useful to do so to figure out what to do for each case, but not so much for the overall problem.

D

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2026-10-11 17:42:30 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2026-10-11 16:57:31 Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions