| From: | shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions |
| Date: | 2026-10-10 21:19:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAGRkXqTteK5W4ztfqexvf-HidKraE9JddDG0Q1THmtNryLALVw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi David,
I(with fable) pulled some numbers from master.pgxn.org today.
For 218 of the 496 distributions the last PGXN release is more than five
years old. I checked the repositories with a script and looked at the
unclear ones one by one.
- 51 are alive upstream. 37 at the repository in META.json, for example hll
and rum, and 14 that moved, for example mongo_fdw and redis_fdw.
- 13 were replaced by something in core.
- 32 had some activity two to five years ago, or I could not tell.
- 122 show no sign of life for five years. 70 of them ship C code.
Only 3 of the 122 are still packaged in the PGDG apt or yum repositories
for 17 and 18.
So the dead and still shipped set looks small. The 51 look like a different
case, the project is alive but nobody releases on PGXN. A pointer to
upstream may be enough there.
I may have missed some moves, so 122 is an upper bound. I can send the
table if you want more detailed data.
Thanks,
Shihao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-10-10 21:30:29 | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2026-10-10 20:04:22 | Re: Policy for Abandoned Extensions |