| From: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Lyes Ameddah <lyes(dot)amd(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Add SKIP LOCKED to VACUUM and ANALYZE |
| Date: | 2018-07-23 14:27:48 |
| Message-ID: | B6A123EF-56EB-4854-8D47-4CFC8FEDB609@amazon.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/22/18, 10:12 PM, "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> The refactoring for CLUSTER is pretty obvious, and makes the API a bit
> cleaner, so attached is a proposal of patch to do so. Thoughts?
Sorry for the delay on these patches! This is nearly identical to
what I started writing last night, so it looks good to me.
+typedef enum ClusterOption
+{
+ CLUOPT_RECHECK, /* recheck relation state */
+ CLUOPT_VERBOSE /* print progress info */
+} ClusterOption;
It looks like the last line here has a bit of extra whitespace
compared to the other code in parsenodes.h.
Nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-07-23 14:32:34 | Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-07-23 14:27:10 | Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents? |