Re: Feature freeze progress report

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report
Date: 2007-04-30 02:27:12
Message-ID: B23D2C6F34DA6B8F44A5C205@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Sunday, April 29, 2007 19:38:21 -0400 Andrew Dunstan
<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
wrote:

> patches held over from feature freeze from the previous
> release will be reviewed within two months of the tree re-opening

a. why 2 months? shouldn't they be given priority, period?
b. what happens after 2 months? we delete them?

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGNVQA4QvfyHIvDvMRAordAJ9SDrMHFumGNynXVjpdjlR5WoMfAgCgt1Xe
+7jMjrOUODmEK+glmGyrHYA=
=SgPr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-04-30 04:31:06 Re: Feature freeze progress report
Previous Message Greg Smith 2007-04-30 02:07:54 Re: too much WAL volume

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-04-30 04:31:06 Re: Feature freeze progress report
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-04-29 23:38:21 Re: Feature freeze progress report