| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| Date: | 2007-04-30 11:54:40 |
| Message-ID: | 4635D900.7030402@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Marc G. Fournier wrote
>
>> patches held over from feature freeze from the previous
>> release will be reviewed within two months of the tree re-opening
>>
>
> a. why 2 months? shouldn't they be given priority, period?
>
Yes, but they don't always seem to get it.
> b. what happens after 2 months? we delete them?
>
>
>
>
Of course not. What I am suggesting is that we set ourselves review
targets. The if we start to get in danger of missing them the authors
and/or anyone else can legitimately start ringing alarm bells.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-04-30 11:56:35 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-30 11:31:45 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-04-30 11:56:35 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-30 11:31:45 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |