Re: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed

From: John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Wells Oliver <wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed
Date: 2021-10-19 23:12:04
Message-ID: AEEF347B-39EC-41FC-8AC9-2AFA54F71391@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

You could always change the size of the RDS instance to something larger than what it currently is running, even just temporarily.

Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 19, 2021, at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Wells Oliver <wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> In an RDS instance with 16GB RAM, I ran a long query which started by
>> setting temp_buffers to 16GB, so I think I plum ran out of memory, but can
>> anyone point me in a different direction if the following log messages
>> indicate something else is awry?
>
> Yeah, this:
>
>> 2021-10-19 21:10:37 UTC::@:[24752]:LOG: server process (PID 25813) was
>> terminated by signal 9: Killed
>
> almost certainly indicates the Linux OOM killer at work. If you were
> running your own system I'd point you to [1], but I doubt that RDS
> lets you put your hands on the relevant knobs.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/kernel-resources.html#LINUX-MEMORY-OVERCOMMIT
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mladen Gogala 2021-10-20 00:04:02 Re: Renaming 800GB size table in postgresql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-10-19 22:01:48 Re: Understanding was terminated by signal 9: Killed