| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: review: FDW API |
| Date: | 2011-01-31 13:31:50 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinwTnxh5JHd69=tD3u7gLzy_C12P00BCg58PDTq@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Shigeru HANADA
<hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> * Is there any use case for changing the handler or validator function
>> of an existign FDW with ALTER? To me it just seems like an unnecessary
>> complication.
>
> AFAICS, the only case for that is upgrading FDW to new one without
> re-creating foreign tables. I don't have strong opinion for this
> issue, and it seems reasonable to remove ALTER feature in first
> version.
-1. I don't think that removing the ability to change this is going
to save a measurable amount of complexity, and it certainly will suck
if you need it and don't have it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-31 14:19:45 | Re: [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases) |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-01-31 13:26:15 | Re: SSI patch version 14 |