| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered |
| Date: | 2011-01-20 04:03:03 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinw9ZqtVBp8pRGR4rRFKQH72Lj8UycHh5mSxYLV@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> This patch looked good, in general, to me. I added a few documentation
> updates and a comment, but it's a very straight-forward patch as far as
> I can tell. Passes all regressions and my additional testing.
I have not looked at the code for this patch at all as yet, but just
as a general user comment - I really, really want this. It's one of
about, uh, two pieces of information that the EXPLAIN output doesn't
give you that is incredibly important for troubleshooting.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2011-01-20 04:03:07 | Re: Include WAL in base backup |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-20 04:01:27 | Re: sepgsql contrib module |