From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Elliot Chance <elliotchance(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Forums at postgresql.com.au |
Date: | 2010-11-19 15:22:09 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinqty1DRnwXVtTWw9W2SzYijQC9SmJYw+-y1FpD@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Dave Page's message of vie nov 19 11:43:34 -0300 2010:
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Elliot Chance <elliotchance(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > However if I had signed up to the forum (and not the mailing list) my >From would have to be subscribed for the mailing list to accept it like:
>> > Elliot Chance <forums(at)postgresql(dot)com(dot)au>
>> > John Smith <forums(at)postgresql(dot)com(dot)au>
>> > ... etc.
>> >
>> > OK, so after a brief background I'd like to organise a solution. Without any other feasible option would this generic address system be allowed?
>>
>> I wouldn't be happy with that as it prevents private replies to the
>> author and would make it easy to send what was intended as a private
>> reply to the public forums by mistake.
>
> Isn't that a secondary use case, though? It would be easy to solve this
> by providing a URL to the post in the forum that you can click; assuming
> the forum interface gives you the option to reply privately.
But I don't want to use the forums - I want to carry on using the
mailing lists as I do now, without having to examine a recipients
address to figure out if its private or not, in the odd case that I
feel a private response is required.
> I wonder if the mailing list would alow posting from an address like
> forums+1357(at)postgresql(dot)com(dot)au if only forums(at)postgresql(dot)com(dot)au is
> subscribed. The number or string after the + would presumably be the
> user ID in the forum or some unique identifier. (Extra points if the
> mailing software at that domain forwards email to the user when sent to
> that address (or maybe a PM in the forum system) -- this would solve
> Dave's concern.)
That would solve it, yes. I don't think mj2 will allow that though -
we've been looking for something similar for sysadmin use.
Note also that having messages come from a single user will also limit
our ability to search the archives effectively.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Laggner | 2010-11-19 16:02:55 | Upgrading 8.2 to 8.4: pg_restore: did not find magic string in file header\n |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-11-19 15:14:59 | Re: Forums at postgresql.com.au |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2010-11-19 16:08:08 | Re: Forums at postgresql.com.au |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-11-19 15:14:59 | Re: Forums at postgresql.com.au |