Re: pg_upgrade patch application process, and move to /bin?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade patch application process, and move to /bin?
Date: 2010-10-20 19:28:25
Message-ID: AANLkTinjbM+n4tAoz-w4aihVJMHcB_MMQDzSNfzXFKxM@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> One more question --- should I be sending pg_upgrade patches to the list
> for approval?  The restructuring patch was large and didn't seem
> necessary to post, and the speedups were tested by the bug reporter, so
> I figured those were OK to apply.

I think it would be good to do that. At least give people a chance to
comment, if they care.

> Oh, and do we want to move pg_upgrade into /bin for 9.1?  There was
> discussion about that six months ago.

I would be inclined to leave it in contrib for a few more releases.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-10-20 19:30:01 Re: pg_upgrade patch application process, and move to /bin?
Previous Message Greg Stark 2010-10-20 19:17:27 Re: PostgreSQL and HugePage