| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature |
| Date: | 2011-02-07 05:00:56 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinZgt7YbE8x4jHYZtGBLi6HR1NRC95jxT=NYZAO@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I've not attempted to implement this idea, but offhand it looks like
> it would take a day or two's work, which seems well worthwhile to
> expend now in the hope of getting this feature right the first time.
>
> Comments?
The design you propose seems pretty good, and I don't think we can
commit this without this change. The scheduling implications are not
great, but since this seems like an important patch I guess we should
live with it, so +1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-07 05:04:02 | Re: ALTER TYPE 2: skip already-provable no-work rewrites |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-07 04:58:01 | Re: pgsql: remove tags. |