From: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Michael C Rosenstein <mcr(at)mdibl(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Do we want SYNONYMS? |
Date: | 2010-12-07 19:53:25 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinZR4D0ZFuGdCvGni=A0g-xN=kODW6s+O2ShGz=@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> Hello
>
> 2010/12/7 Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> > Your perception has been mirrored on the Oracle free list. Really what
> > PostgreSQL people need to come to grips with is whether or not we want
> > to make it easier for others to port to Pg or not. (assuming
> > reasonableness)
> >
>
> it's question if this is task more for EnterpriseDB and less for
> PostgreSQL?
>
>
FWIW, EnterpriseDB Advanced Server has had the SYNONYM feature for quite a
while now: http://www.enterprisedb.com/documentation/ddl-synonims.html
Regards,
--
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.EnterpriseDB.com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet
Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Reuven M. Lerner | 2010-12-07 20:56:17 | Re: Hanging with pg_restore and large objects |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2010-12-07 19:40:54 | Re: Tool for data modeling and ER diagram |