Re: git: uh-oh

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com> wrote:
>>> and the result is that things are looking pretty clean :-)
>>
>> Hey, that's great.  But I wonder why Magnus got a different result.
>
> This is the first time I've posted these incantations for excising the
> unwanted history, so he would not have been using them.

Well, he did something fairly similar. Not sure if it was exactly the same.

>> Can you post the repo you ended up with somewhere?
>
> Well, it's a Bazaar repository at the moment :-)
>
> But, I'll re-run it targetting git, and push it somewhere. github?
> anywhere better?

No, that's fine.

> I think we should start a git repository somewhere containing the
> precise conversion recipe - i.e.:
>
>  * cvs2git options file
>  * cvs2git invocation command line
>  * all scripts that massage the CVS repository before conversion, or the
> Git repository afterwards

Yeah, that would be great.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company