From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: git: uh-oh |
Date: | 2010-09-06 07:50:02 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikGMnSc18dN2Zvc4W6ktHzQ4begLuXVtmYiymoo@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 04:55, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> and the result is that things are looking pretty clean :-)
>>>
>>> Hey, that's great. But I wonder why Magnus got a different result.
>>
>> This is the first time I've posted these incantations for excising the
>> unwanted history, so he would not have been using them.
>
> Well, he did something fairly similar. Not sure if it was exactly the same.
No. I used "cvs admin", not rcs. The specific commands I ran were the
following (and I'm pretty darn sure I posted this before):
cd pgsql/src/backend/parser
cvs admin -o 2.90.2.1:2.90.2.2 gram.c
cvs admin -o 2.89: gram.c
cd ../../interfaces/ecpg/preproc
cvs admin -o 1.5.2.1:1.5.2.2 pgc.c
cvs admin -o 1.3: pgc.c
cvs admin -o 1.11.2.1:1.11.2.2 preproc.c
cvs admin -o 1.7: preproc.c
I would assume cvs just runs rcs commands behind the scenes, but I
confess knowing way too little about that stuff to be sure ;)
I'll be happy to re-run with the rcs commands instead.
>>> Can you post the repo you ended up with somewhere?
>>
>> Well, it's a Bazaar repository at the moment :-)
>>
>> But, I'll re-run it targetting git, and push it somewhere. github?
>> anywhere better?
>
> No, that's fine.
Yes, it's fine - just please be sure to remove the repository once
we're done with the "master conversion", so people don't end up
accidentally cloning an incorrect one :D
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-06 07:51:54 | Re: git: uh-oh |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-06 07:47:27 | Re: git: uh-oh |