Re: trace_recovery_messages

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: trace_recovery_messages
Date: 2010-08-25 11:26:42
Message-ID: AANLkTinY=qesv12Vd5PWoDhjenew6JPGS13VanjAkDeJ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> This is definitely a stop-gap facility. If you were to propose a more
> general facility for increasing log level of specific modules, I'm sure
> the rest of us would see that implemented across the rest of the code.

Yeah, I was thinking about that, too.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Max Bowsher 2010-08-25 11:27:55 Re: git: uh-oh
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-08-25 11:19:16 Re: git: uh-oh