Re: Native XML

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Anton <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Native XML
Date: 2011-03-10 15:36:09
Message-ID: AANLkTinVUUhgfHMBN1xBWmD6j03QU_p9uhvGRrjJqdgp@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Then I think the answer is that we need both data types.  One for
> text-XML and one for binary-XML.

That's what I think, too. I'm not sure whether we want both of them
in core, but I think the binary-XML one would, at a minimum, make an
awfully nice extension to ship in contrib. I'd also like to have text
and binary JSON types... very MongoDB-ish...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-03-10 15:43:03 Re: Theory of operation of collation patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-03-10 15:34:00 Re: FuncExpr.collid/OpExpr.collid unworkably serving double duty