Re: Extensions and custom_variable_classes

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions and custom_variable_classes
Date: 2010-12-20 05:22:31
Message-ID: AANLkTinN5ODKRir-+8gh8=2gvmt2ohWivvLgjM-hP23t@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 03:39, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> Just so that we're on the same line here, if we are to remove
> custom_variable_classes then we don't keep any GUC related code into the
> extension patch, right?  So that ExtensionSetCVC() and friends disappear
> entirely.

I think so. It would be better to remove the CVC support and related code.

Preloading modules that defines CVC is a good direction to fix the issue,
but we need more consideration about where to do it.

--
Itagaki Takahiro

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-12-20 06:16:34 Re: serializable lock consistency
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-12-20 05:10:38 Re: pg_ctl and port number detection