Re: Extensions and custom_variable_classes

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions and custom_variable_classes
Date: 2010-12-20 08:58:58
Message-ID: 87d3ow6crx.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think so. It would be better to remove the CVC support and related code.

Will isolate that into another branch just in case and prepare a patch
with that removed.

> Preloading modules that defines CVC is a good direction to fix the issue,
> but we need more consideration about where to do it.

I checked for doing that too, but both shared_preload_libraries and
local_preload_libraries are managed way earlier than the point where we
can connect to a database a check what extensions it contains. So that
appeared to me as a dead-end.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Radosław Smogura 2010-12-20 11:29:08 Re: Binary timestamp with without timezone
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-12-20 08:56:33 Re: Extensions and custom_variable_classes