| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE ... REPLACE WITH |
| Date: | 2011-01-20 01:55:22 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinBVG2Dw4_7=BJf3iqJ=zCvp=yT_7wcDDNkVdtS@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 17:46 -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
>
>> I'll go ahead and mark the patch Returned with Feedback.
>
> My understanding of the meaning of that is polite rejection. If you do
> that there is no further author comment and we move to July 2011. That
> then also rejects your own patch with what you say is an alternative
> implementation...
>
> Is that what you wish? That isn't what I wish, either way. I suggest you
> mark it Waiting on Author, so we can discuss it further.
Simon,
I have no idea what you're talking about here. It is entirely fitting
and appropriate to reject a patch the guts of which have not been
written four days into the final CommitFest. Doing so does not
somehow reject Noah's patches, which stand or fall on their own
merits.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-20 01:56:31 | Re: REVIEW: WIP: plpgsql - foreach in |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-20 01:53:08 | Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups |